Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/HTML-CSS/jax.js

Thursday, November 7, 2013

Lebesgue Measure

Problem 1

Let An be any sequence of subsets of R
(i) if AnA then λ(An)λ(A)
(ii)λ(lim infAn)lim infnλ(An), where lim infAn={x:xAnultimately}

solution:
(i)
Let  Fn=ni=1Ei, F=En,A=An, where En is measurable such that AnEn, and EnAn is negligible (it is easy to prove such En exists), clearly AF,
FnF, therefore λ(Fn)λ(F)
λ(An)λ(Fn)λ(An)+λ(FnAn)λ(An)+ni=1λ(EiAi)=λ(An)
λ(Fn)=λ(An)λ(A)λ(F), and since FnF, we have λ(An)λ(A)
(ii)
Let Bn=knAk, then BnB=lim infAn
λ(Bn)λ(An)lim infnλ(Bn)=λ(lim infAn)lim infnλ(An)
The equality follows from (i)

Problem 2

For A[a,b]R, λ(A) is also called the exterior measure of A in [a,b] and is denoted λe(A), the interior measure of A in [a,b], denoted λi(A), is defined by the formula
λi(A)=(ba)λe([a,b]A)in general, λi(A)λe(A) ; the set A is measurable if and only if λi(A)=λe(A)

solution:
is easy
We use λ instead of λe denote I=[a,b], let J be any bounded interval λ(I)=λ(IA)+λ(IA)=λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)=λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)λ(IJ)+λ(IJ)=λ(I)
Therefore we have λ(IAJ)+λ(IAJ)=λ(IJ), and it is easy to see that λ(AJ)+λ(AJ)=λ(J) Suppose S is a subset of R for every ε>0, there exists U,SU=Jn and λ(Jn)<λ(S)+ε
λ(AS)+λ(AS)λ(AU)+λ(AU)λ(AJn)+λ(AJn)=(λ(AJn)+λ(AJn))=λ(Jn)<λ(S)+ε
Since ε is arbitrary, we can conclude that A is measurable 

Problem 3

If A is a Lebesgue-measurable subset of R such that λ(A)>0, then the difference set D={ab:a,cA} is a neighborhood of 0, that is, (δ,δ)D for some δ>0.

No comments:

Post a Comment